Last of the Monster Kids

Last of the Monster Kids
"LAST OF THE MONSTER KIDS" - Available Now on the Amazon Kindle Marketplace!

Monday, October 25, 2021

Halloween 2021: October 25th



It's hard to believe its been seven years since the “V/H/S' series burned itself out. The first two films in the found footage anthology trilogy helped directors like Adam Wingard, Simon Barrett, Ti West, David Bruckner, Radio Silence, and Timo Tjahjanto ascend further up the horror A-list. Why not everyone agrees on the quality of those movies, the consensus is that both of them contain at least one fantastic segment. “V/H/S: Viral,” meanwhile, was bad enough to totally derail the franchise's momentum. Yet it's rare that a profitable horror series stays inactive forever.  “V/H/S/94” reboots the sex-and-violence spectacle by doubling-down on the retro aesthetic the first two played with. And, seemingly to insure the quality is closer in line to “V/H/S” and “V/H/S/2” than “Viral,” Tjahjanto and Barrett returned to direct segments. (With Bruckner and Radio Silence producing.) 

The framing device concerns a SWAT team, in 1994, storming into a warehouse owned by a suicide cult. Alongside the dead bodies, they uncover disturbing video tapes. “Sewer Drain” follows a small town reporter and her cameraman, as they investigate reports of a cryptid known as the Ratman. Descending into the sewer, they discover more than they bargained for. In “The Empty Wake,” a young employee at a funeral home is asked to video tape the wake of a man who died in a terrible accident. As a storm blows in, she notices something disturbing happening in the casket. “The Subject” is about a mad scientist stitching together grotesque cyborgs. When the cops bust in, the creations must defend themselves. Lastly, “Terror” sees a far-right militia group capturing a mythological monster. They hope to use it to further their causes but the beast is not easily controlled. 

“V/H/S/94” uses its shot-on-video gimmick nicely to create a disturbing sense of immediacy. This is especially evident in “Storm Drain.” Directed by Chloe Okuna – an up-and-comer who has only handled shorts before this – it gets increasingly creepier as it goes on. The segment escalates from showing us weirdos in the small town, to strange sights in the sewer drains, to a disturbingly filthy homeless man. The story takes a surprising turn in its second half. When the cryptid crawls on-screen, it's brought to life with some creative creature effects. There's also a strain of weirdo humor and social commentary here. The interview subjects are amusingly awkward. The climax combines sick gore and surreal dialogue to great effect. Meanwhile, the reporter protagonist is only concerned with helping the local homeless population if it'll help further her career. Which is a bleak but not unfair assessment of the news landscape. If nothing else, this segment will have you incorporating “Hail Raatma” into your lexicon of pop culture phrases. 

“The Empty Wake” sees Simon Barrett returning to the series he created, following his solo debut “Séance.” It's the segment that reminds me the most of the first “V/H/S,” in that it has an extremely simple narrative. This one is really just a girl alone in a room with a dead body. It is mostly interested in exploiting the found footage style for atmosphere. The occasional freaky noise is enough to put you ill-at-ease. You also find yourself rooting for the protagonist, a bored teenage girl trying to pass the time and keep her job. The conclusion to the segment features some creative and very creepy gore effects. A novel spin is put on the premise of a walking corpse, to squirm-inducing effect.

Timo Tjahjanto's “The Subject” is the Indonesian director's homage to Frankenstein. It features a mad doctor, who rants about how the world will appreciate his genius soon enough, and assembles grotesque monsters from dead bodies. The difference is these cyborgs have weapons, massive swords and machine guns, built into their arms. The creature designs are creative. Literally telling the story from the monsters' perspective, forcing the audience to sympathize with the hideous techno-corpses, is a nice touch. Once the monsters start to defend themselves, the story pivots towards elaborate action sequences. As you'd expect from the director of “The Night Comes for Us.”  Yet I found myself a little let down by this one. There's a lot of lousy CGI gore and muzzle flash in the second half. It's the longest segment in the movie and definitely feels drawn out at times, especially in regards to the muddled ending. 

“Terror” was handled by Ryan Prows, previously of “Lowlife.” This is the segment with the most humor in it. The militia is staggeringly incompetent, constantly undermining their own attempts at being taken seriously. It's not surprising when they do more harm to themselves than anyone else with their heavy artillery at the end... But it is pretty funny. Prows also highlights how hyper-masculinity like this also, often, barely disguises homoerotic tendencies. The cameraman seems fixated on men peeing and kissing. Once the monster – I won't spoil exactly what it is – gets loose, we are greeted to a cleverly horrific reinvention of a classic character. My only real criticism of this one is that its sequences of splattering violence are repetitive, at least until you figure out what their purpose in the story is.

As is practically a tradition with this series, the framing device is the weakest element of “V/H/S/94.” The non-stop profanity is exhausting and the ending – which I think is suppose to provide an origin story of sorts for the entire series – is underwhelming. Best I can say about the framing device is that director Jennifer “Knives and Skin” Reeder makes it feel like a Halloween fun house at times, with the cops coming across different rooms full of weird displays. While not as scary or fresh as the firs two entries, “V/H/S/94” is definitely a return to form after the weak “Viral.” It's funny, macabre, and grotesque in equal measure. If the series continues, I hope they stick with the gimmick of making this VHS tapes themed series actually look like it was shot on VHS tapes. [7/10]




Early in the lifespan of the Halloween Blog-a-thon, I reviewed as many of the classic Universal Studios monster movies as I could get my hands on. I've tried to carry on this tradition by including at least one vintage horror flick from Universal in each year's marathon. Yet, since I've already reviewed all the well known and easily accessible examples, I've been forced to seek out increasingly more obscure Universal films. Which brings us to “The Missing Guest” from 1938. This hard-to-find movie is most notably for being a remake of “Secret of the Blue Room,” an obscure old dark house flick Universal made only five years earlier. (Which was itself a remake of a German film.) I thought that one was alright, so it stands to reason this one will be decent too, right?

The Baldrich mansion is home to the Blue Room, a supposedly haunted room that has been sealed off after a mysterious murder occurred there twenty years ago. Reporter "Scoop" Hanlon is tasked with staying a night in the cursed room. He arrives at the mansion to find an elaborate costume party. There he meets Stephanie, the daughter of the mansion's current owner. Her attempted beau Larry decides to brave the Blue Room. When Larry mysteriously vanishes the next morning, Scoop is suspected of the crime. More murder and mystery ensues as everyone attempts to unravel the enigma of the Blue Room.

Universal's first “Blue Room” mystery was directed by Kurt Neumann, who went on to make genre classics like “The Fly” and “Kronos.” “The Missing Guest,” meanwhile, was directed by John Rawlins. Rawlins spent most of his career directing unambitious crime thrillers and serials. (“Dick Tracy vs. Gruesome” qualities as his most notable credit.) Rawlins was clearly not the director Neumann was. “The Missing Guest” lacks much of the expressionistic style that made “Secret of the Blue Room” mildly interesting. It's not an especially compelling mystery either. The film wastes time on minor plot points. Like Scoop pretending to be a psychic researcher, under convoluted circumstances. Or Stephanie's dad being implemented in the murder. Revelations, like a phonograph hidden in the Blue Room, make no impact. The final resolution to the mystery is as underwhelming as can be. 

However, the movie still has the occasional moment of notable classic horror atmosphere. There's a great scene early on, where the camera assumes the perspective of a guest arriving at the mansion. We see the door open and the maid scream. More people are shocked into silence as this unseen figure walks back. Soon, this intruder is revealed to be a ghostly spectre who then exposes a grotesque face. It's all a practical joke, we immediately find out, but it's still the highlight of the movie. There's also some notable use of shadows, cobwebs, and a spooky basement in the last act. The isolated mansion setting paired with a dark and stormy night -- heavy shades of "The Cat and the Canary" there -- provides some nice, spooky vibes. But the movie never comes remotely close to topping that P.O.V. sequence. 

In fact, far too much of "The Missing Guest" is devoted to pedestrian comic relief. At the beginning of the film, we learn Scoop is stuck writing for the women's section of the paper, which he finds humiliating. His editor is trying to invest in a profitable new invention, which leads to multiple appearances from a wacky scientist with goofy gimmicks. In the second half of the film, a pair of buffoonish detectives wander into the story. These two destroy every scene they are in with excessive mugging and antics. And they are in a lot of scenes. All of this is in addition to Scoop's own fast-paced dialogue and the goofy costumes at the party. (A doctor is the backend of a horse costume, for one example.) the constant, ill-advised attempts at humor overrides any spooky atmosphere the film manages to achieve. 

All the stuff involving the reporter and the detectives are new but, from what I recall, this hews fairly closely to the 1933 version. Universal would retell this story again only six years later, this time as a musical/comedy called "Murder in the Blue Room." I guess I have to watch that one next year. (All of these movies are in black-and-white, by the way, so use your imagination to add the blue.) To sum it up, "The Missing Guest" is totally typical of the underachieving old dark house mysteries Universal, and other studios, pumped out by the dozens in the thirties and forties. It's got one stand-out scene, which is enough to satisfy my desire for some old black-and-white atmosphere, but it has little else of interest to offer. At least it's less tedious than "Secret of the Chateau." [5/10]




50 States of Fright: The Golden Arm

Who mourns for Quibi? Jeffrey Katzenberg's extremely dumb idea for a streaming service provided subscribers with “quick bites” of big budget, high quality entertainment. So they have something to watch on their phones while waiting in line at the D.M.V. or, I don't know, sitting on the toilet or whatever. Quibi had the bad luck to launch during a year when nobody had much cause to leave their houses. Yet even in a non-pandemic landscape, I can't imagine a venture like this being that successful. A number of big name talents were attracted to the service. At least one of the shows struck me as kind of interesting. That would be “50 States of Fright,” an anthology series linked by the idea of drawing stories from the folklore and history of every American state.

“50 States of Fright” was produced by Sam Raimi. He would direct the first episode as well. “The Golden Arm,” naturally, is set in Raimi's home state of Michigan. It concerns Dave, a humble lumberjack. His wife, Heather, has expensive taste and demands the best things in life. One fateful day, he asks her to help him chop down a tree. This is when an accident occurs, that results in her arm pinned under a fallen tree. Dave is forced to chop it off to save her. Afterwards, her vanity causes her to reject having a stump for one arm. Dave decides to build a prosthetic for her and Heather demands it be built from gold. The gold poisons her blood and leads to a quick death. When Dave goes to retrieve the arm he made, it has unforeseen consequences for him. 

“The Golden Arm” has a pretty silly premise and requires its characters to act unreasonably multiple times. Heather is dressed up for a social event when Dave asks her to help him chop down a tree. Even though neither of them could've foreseen the accident that took her arm, it's still an unlikely chain of events. His decision to retrieve the arm from her grave is never explained. The character just suddenly has a frenzied desire to retrieve this solid gold appendage he made. Not to mention the wife comes off like a real caricature, demanding gold and jewelry from her working-class husband. Also, can people even be poisoned by gold? I don't know if that's a real thing.

Despite a story that can charitably be called dumb, “The Golden Arm” isn't totally disposable. Sam Raimi doesn't let the “made for cellphones” format leash his distinctive style any. Heather's arm being cleaved off leads to an “Evil Dead” style spray of blood covering the screen. As Dave hears creepy sounds in the empty house, the camera crash-zooms on various objects. There's some swirling perspective shots, especially when the vengeful ghost of the wife leaps out of a door. An especially clever bit has a photograph changing, from nostalgic to ominous, every time the husband looks at it. And the gore is nicely brutal too. “The Golden Arm” is cut into three parts – the first and last six minutes, the middle ten – which makes it easy to watch this as a half-hour of television, now that Roku has rescued Quibi's doomed programming. I don't know if the rest of the episodes will have much impact without Raimi's skills behind the camera but I'm sort of interested in trying them out. [6/10] 




Screaming Mad George is one of those names you forever associate with the really outrageous horror movies of the eighties. This is the guy who made the famous shunting of “Society” possible. Yet before he became an in-demand special effects artist, George – real name Jôji Tani – was a singer in the New York hardcore punk scene. His band, The Mad, became infamous for incorporating bloody special effects into their shows. They would also play demented 8mm movies George and his friends made behind them on-stage, to further enhance the ambiance. Among these films was “It Took Guts,” a near plotless seven minute experience that concerns a teenager who gets a taste of his own blood... And then decides he wants some more.

Screaming Mad George is only officially credited with the music for “It Took Guts,” a churning and discordant rock score that gets more frantic as it goes on. But I imagine he had some input in the short film's content as well. The effects aren't nearly as crude as I expected. Yeah, the blood is a little washed-out and watery. A fake eyeball that features prominently doesn't look too convincing. And the ream of titular guts that spill out on-screen, and are quickly consumed afterwards, look like they might be made from ground hamburger. Yet it's all way better done then you'd expect from a bunch of kids screwing around on-camera. The scene of the boy slicing his own belly open is surprisingly convincing. 

Now the question remains, does seven minutes of a kid graphically eating himself have much artistic value? There is certainly something disturbing about the pure exuberance the main character displays when consuming his own flesh. He really goes for it, pushing his own guts into his mouth with absolute glee. Directors Eric Forsberg and Charles Schneider – the latter of which also plays the main character – emphasize the disgusting content of this story. An eyeball is squish and intestines are tossed around. The score is often farcical, with goofy sound effects mixed in with the music. This was obviously an act of prank-ish, juvenile gross-out humor. Yet it's impressive in its own sick sort of way. And that's pretty punk rock when you think about it. [6/10]


No comments: