Alice, Sweet Alice (1976)
There have been a lot of movies made about Catholicism. This is probably just because a lot of filmmakers come out of New York City, a heavily Catholic area. Yet I think there's an argument to be made that the rituals and institutions of Catholicism are especially cinematic. The garb of the priests, the ritualized customs of communion and confession, the symbolism inherent in stained glass windows, collars, rosaries. Not to mention the long history of the church certainly provides lots of grist for storytellers. Naturally, the horror genre touches upon the Catholic Church frequently. At the opposite end of “The Exorcist,” where the Catholic Church saves the day, is “Alice, Sweet Alice.” Alfred Sole's infamous 1976 proto-slasher was so critical of the Church that it's been publicly condemned on more than one occasion.
In Paterson, New Jersey during the early sixties, Catherine does her best to raise her two daughters. While seven year old Karen is angelic and beloved, twelve year old Alice is moody, mischievous, and shunned. Catherine substitutes the girls' missing father – the two are divorced – with the Catholic Church. During Karen's first communion, tragedy strikes. The girl is strangled to death, her corpse set on fire, by a strange attacker in a feminine mask and a yellow rain slicker. Alice is widely suspected for the crime, due to her disturbing behavior, but she insists on her innocence. The killer continues to attack throughout the apartment complex, Alice and Karen's father being drawn into the mystery.
Speaking as someone non-religious, the main benefit of being a church-going person is, as far as I can tell, the sense of community and togetherness that come with a good congregation. “Alice, Sweet Alice” portrays the far more common truth. The film depicts religion as a system of judgment, as a way for people to condemn others. Alice demands to take communion, longing for the acceptance it brings, but is repeatedly refused. A crone-faced nun stares at the girls as they kneel at the vestibule. An infirm Catholic priests whines and begs throughout the film, clearly suffering from dementia. Sole shoots the scenes set in the church in cramped close-ups, emphasizing the lack of privacy in this place. When a kindly priest tries to deliver peace and forgiveness to the killer, she returns a repressed lust to him. “Alice, Sweet Alice” has been referred to “anti-Catholic” and that seems fair. The film stands against all organized religion.
Invoking the rituals of the Catholic Church is a primary way “Alice, Sweet Alice” generates its eerie tone. This is a film where nothing ever feels right. A free-form menace floats in the air, the events simultaneously feeling dream-like and anxiety inducing. The similarly dreamy musical score helps further this tone. Into this atmosphere of uncertain, Sole introduces moments of shocking violence and uncomfortable suggestions of depravity. The murder scenes in “Alice, Sweet Alice” attack with an undeniably ferocity. The stairway stabbing sequence, undoubtedly the film's scariest moment, occurs in a closed-in, cramp location, a sensitive part of the body being pierced. A later stabbing is similarly claustrophobic in its execution, before the violence escalates with a brick smashed over the head and into the mouth, before the body is dropped out a window. If the violence doesn't make you flinch, the moments devoted to a morbidly obese landlord pawing at a young girl, or a cop commenting on the same twelve year old girl's breasts, most definitely will.
Watching “Alice, Sweet Alice” after re-visiting “Hereditary” earlier in the month makes me wonder if Ari Aster is a fan of this film. Alfred Sole's movie deals with Big Emotions. After her daughter is murdered, Katherine shrieks in agony. After her sister is attacked, she similarly screams for the heavens. The following scene in the hospital features a similar moment of hysterics. This is only right, as “Alice, Sweet Alice” deals heavily with emotional trauma. Much like how the institution of the church has failed the characters, so has the institution of family. Resentment, especially against Alice, floats throughout the household. The simple act of sitting in a car headed towards the funeral is thick with difficulty.
So what of Alice? It's interesting that, despite getting title billing, Alice does not end up being the killer. The mad-woman in the distinctive yellow slicker and off-putting transparent mask, with streaked harlot's make-up down its face, ends up being a minor supporting character, motivated by her own Catholic guilt to punish those she deems unworthy of God. Yet why is Alice's behavior so creepy? Why does she hide artifacts from her dead sister? Why does she seemed repulsed by the landlord in one scene and then seemingly attempts to seduce him in the next? Alice is rarely shown love throughout the film. She's usually yelled at and verbally punished. Even her mother, who tries to connect with Alice, is more off-put than anything else by her daughter. (This is why she keeps starting her period a secret.) Alice may not be our killer but she is symbolic of all the failings “Alice, Sweet Alice” exposes. Paula Shepphard, who was 18 at the time of filming, is deeply unnerving in the part.
Alfred Sole has made few films besides “Alice, Sweet Alice.” He began in pornography and would go onto slasher parody “Pandemonium,” but this film is his claim-to-fame. And this film is, perhaps, most infamous for being Brooke Shields' debut. After she shot to fame, it was re-issued on VHS under the title “Holy Terror,” her face and name prominent on the box. Horror fans, meanwhile, have come to cherish “Alice” as an extremely creepy, disquieting early example of the slasher genre. (The film heavily resembles a giallo, both in tone and its detective story, but Sole claims he was unfamiliar with that subgenre.) Indie horror auteur Dante Tomaselli, a cousin of Alfred Sole, has been working on a remake since 2006 and still mentions it occasionally. Until that gets made, “Alice, Sweet Alice” will remain a distinctive horror classic. [8/10]
Forever Evil (1988)
Even though JD and I only spent one day at Monster-Mania this year, we still had certain traditions we tried to fulfill. Such as stopping by the VHS Preservation Society's booth and asking for a recommendation. As always, I asked them for something “weird and old.” I was pointed in the direction of “Forever Evil,” which shouldn't be confused with “Beyond Evil” or “Eternal Evil.” The way the film was described to me, it seemed abreast with flicks like “Demonwind,” “Hellgate,” or “Spookies.” Ya know, an oddball eighties horror flick about college kids in an isolated location encountering all sorts of demons, monsters, and weird shit. It turns out “Forever Evil” sort of belongs to this particular subgenre for its first few minutes before shifting towards something even goofier.
Marc joins a group of old college friends, including his pregnant girlfriend, for a retreat at a secluded cabin. The group is unaware that a supernatural cult is active in the near-by area. Demonic entities arise and kill everyone except Marc. In the following months, Marc becomes obsessed with uncovering the truth. He teams up with a police detective and a journalist to get to the bottom of things. He uncovers a conspiracy to bring an ancient god of evil, called Yog Kothag, into flesh-and-blood existence. Marc hunts down this evil, looking to destroy it before anymore innocents are killed.
“Forever Evil” begins as if it's another low budget “Evil Dead” rip-off, likely made by a group of friends goofing around. The old college buddies share private jokes and particular dialogue that is meaningless to us but probably meant something to the people making the movie. P.O.V. monsters tears them apart, frequently in very cheesy ways. This only accounts for the film's first twenty minutes. “Forever Evil” does not let its low budget restrict its imagination. The film then reveals an elaborate mythology, obviously inspired by Lovecraft. (The Necronomicon is name-dropped.) “Forever Evil” bends towards lucubrate conspiracy theories and action movie theatrics, the likes of which you probably didn't expect from a super low budget gore-fest. You certainly can't fault the filmmaker's ambitions.
Fans of gooey special effects and low-budget buffoonery will certainly find some things to entertain them in “Forever Evil.” The gore effects are mostly pretty crude, being limited to people smeared with fake blood... Save for some especially graphic gags. The highlight of the film is when Marc is haunted by spectres of his dead girlfriend and their unborn child. The only time the film comes to close to spooky at all is when a ghoulish baby crawls up to him out of the darkness. Another highlight is when the ghost of the girlfriend claws a fetus from her pregnant belly. That was pretty wicked. Most of the film's climax is devoted to fighting an undying zombie named Alfie, the earthly manifestation of Yog Kothag. Despite his threatening appearance, Alfie repeatedly gets the shit kicked out of him by the heroes. He's shot, stabbed, burned, and eventually blown up. Yet he just keeps coming, the make-up job getting gooier and messier. That's the kind of tenacity I respect in a monster.
Ultimately though, it's hard to recommend “Forever Evil.” From what I've described of the movie, you'd fully expect this thing to be over in eighty minutes, right? Ninety max? Nope, “Forever Evil” runs for nearly two hours. Most of that runtime is devoted to Marc chatting with the police detective and the female journalist, preparing for his final battle with the forces of evil. It's hard to get too invested in this stuff. The film starts to drag very quickly and it focuses on building up a mythology that the filmmakers cared about way more than the audience. The relationship between the cast, which includes an extremely sudden romance, is similarly uninvolving. Even after the undying zombie is defeated, the film still doesn't have the good sense to end. An extended epilogue attempts to wrap up any lingering plot points.
If “Forever Evil” had run about a half-hour shorter and focused on its goofy low budget atmosphere and grisly special effects, it would've been a totally entertaining slice of eighties horror cheese. Instead, the filmmakers were a little too confident in their own story. The result is a bloated creature feature that the audience can barely be bothered to follow along with. It's a bummer too, as this one came real close to satisfying my desire for weirdo eighties cheese. By the way, the VHSPS disc includes a lo-fi trailer for something called “Murder Rap” at the start and features Oingo Boingo as the menu music. Now that I can get into! [5/10]
The Twilight Zone: Nightcrawlers
The enduring influence and popularity of “The Twilight Zone” means there have been several attempts to resurrect Rod Serling's series. Aside from the unlucky theatrical movie and a TV film, there's been three long form TV revivals. Before the most recent version with Jordan Peele, and a largely forgotten version with Forest Whittaker, there was the 1985 “Zone.” Notable filmmakers like Wes Craven, Peter Medak, and Joe Dante would be behind the camera, with authors like Ray Bradbury, Harlon Ellison, and Stephen King contributing stories. The eighties “Twilight Zone” never really caught on in its day, being canceled after two seasons, revived for a syndicated third season, and then canceled again. Since then, the show has developed a cult following. Of all the episodes, “Nightcrawlers,” from season one and directed by William Friedkin, seems especially well regarded.
State trooper Wells pulls into a roadside dinner. He's just come from a bullet-ridden crime scene at a local hotel. At that same time, a man named Price enters the establishment. Price soon reveals himself to be a Vietnam veteran. Disturbed by his memories of the war, Price also has the ability to manifest his dreams and nightmares. Soon, an alternation with the state trooper triggers a full-blown Vietnam flashback in the man. A series of undead soldiers descent on the dinner, emerging from Price's disturbed imagination.
Like so much eighties pop culture, “Nightcrawlers” shows the public consciousness further digesting the aftereffects of the Vietnam War. Friedkin's segment, the last part of the first season's fourth episode, brings the carnage of the war back home in a rather literal fashion. “The Exorcist” director creates a fittingly foreboding atmosphere. Beginning with heavy rainfall, a doom-laden tone quickly overtakes the short. Scott Paulin gives an appropriately intense and unhinged performance as Price, his frenzied delivery ramping up the tension. And that's before gory, zombie soldiers crawl out of the darkness, a nightmarish image if I've ever seen one. I have no idea if the rest of the eighties “Twilight Zone” stood up to scrutiny but “Nightcrawlers” is a delightfully dark and creepy story, well directed and acted with some surprisingly graphic shocks. [7/10]
Critters: A New Binge: The Final Battle
“A New Binge” tries to pull off a fittingly grand finale on its very low budget. “The Final Battle” has Chris, having embraced his half-Crite lineage, facing off against the Bounty Hunters at his hometown's hot dog eating contest. The Crites, however, see the gathering as an excuse to start devouring everyone in their path. Utter chaos breaks out, the furry monsters killing indiscriminately. Realizing his alien brothers are just as bad as the Bounty Hunters, his friends and family endangered, Chris makes the hard decision to fight his own kind.
After a run of solidly entertaining episode, “A New Binge” stumbles a bit in its finale. There are solid gags here. Such as a hot dog eating contestant continuing to chow down, even after the monsters attack. Or Brian's attempt to dissuade the Bounty Hunters and Chris remembering his uncle not-so-inspiring words. However, the show ends up trying a little too hard in its final episode. The low budget really shows here. Though it's cool to see the Critters form into a giant ball again, a call-back to “Critters 2,” the special effects are not so special here. The last few minutes are a storm of Crites exploding in an unconvincing manner. The sequel hook for another season is pretty bad though. (And unlikely, considering how “A New Binge” got abandoned by its production company.) I'm happy to see “A New Binge” doesn't soften its monstrous invaders any, letting them be vicious killers here. And there's even an attempt at some pathos, as Chris' mom takes some drastic measure. However, the show remains too flippant and aggressively wacky for any real emotional resonance. [6/10]
However, I think I'll give “Critters: A New Binge” a positive score over all. The series' extremely low budget was readily apparent from time to time. The writing was extremely crude but I still ended up laughing frequently. The cast is above average, with Joey Morgan being an especially well-suited lead. The web series even put some surprising spins on established “Critters” lore, as it was. I initially wondered why an eight part web series was made instead of a new movie. Then I realized, if you clipped out the end credits, the entirety of “A New Binge” still runs only about an hour. So let's be thankful this was allowed to be the goofy trifle it is and not a badly padded out feature. If nothing else, it's better than “Zombeavers.” [Critters: A New Binge: 7/10]
No comments:
Post a Comment