Last of the Monster Kids

Last of the Monster Kids
"LAST OF THE MONSTER KIDS" - Available Now on the Amazon Kindle Marketplace!
Showing posts with label hgl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hgl. Show all posts

Thursday, September 18, 2025

Halloween 2025: September 18th

 

Here are the things we know to be true. In 1974, after losing their previous home in Hurricane Agnes, the Smurl family – Jack and Janet, their daughters Dawn and Heather, and his parents John and Mary – moved into a duplex on Chase Street in West Pittston, Pennsylvania. The home was an admitted fixer-upper, with a creaky foundation, in a town plagued with sewer piping issues and built atop a honeycomb of old mining areas. Eighteen months after moving in, the family reported your standard poltergeist activity: Missing objects, weird smells, creepy voices, and knocking sounds coming from the walls. (Especially the wall the grandparents shared with the bedroom of their teenage granddaughters.) After Janet gave birth to twins, Shannon and Carin, the family claims the haunting intensified. Supposed incidents include a light falling from the kitchen ceiling, Dawn being pushed down the stairs, Shannon seeing floating figures in her room, and a pet German Shepherd being lifted into the air and thrown into a wall by an unseen force. Most notoriously, Jack – a devout Catholic who underwent brain surgery in 1983 – says a succubus raped him in an episode that aligns closely with sleep paralysis symptoms. 

The family went to the press with their claims, who crowded the streets to such a degree that the neighbors complained. Several Catholic priests performed exorcisms in the house and stayed overnight, reporting nothing unusual. The family refused psychological counseling and denied writers from skepticism based publications enter their home. The help they did seek out was from Ed and Lorraine Warren, the infamous "parapsychologists" who claimed that the Amityville Horror hoax was still a legitimate haunting. The Warrens said multiple ghosts and at least one demonic entity were inhabiting the home. Ed Warren said he saw demonic black masses forming in the air and heard evil voices. Around this time, the money strapped Smurl family was also negotiating book and movie deals about their story. This is why actor Jason Miller visited the house during this period. A book co-written by the Warrens, entitled "The Haunted: One Family's Nightmare," was published in 1986. It was poorly reviewed. A made-for-TV film adaptation followed in 1991. The paranormal activity stopped rather anticlimactically sometime before the Smurls moved out of the house in 1987. Subsequent owners of the property have reported no ghostly events. 

This we also know to be true: "The Conjuring" cinematic universe, extremely loosely based on Ed and Lorraine's career, is the highest grossing horror franchise to date, having made over two billions dollars across nine or ten films. The last three entries in the series have been slightly less successful than the ones before them, the third "Annabelle" and "Conjuring" entries and the second "Nun" all failing to cross two hundred million at the global box office. While that's still a lot of profit, it does suggest some diminishing returns. This might be why it was announced that "The Conjuring 4" would be the final entry about the Warrens themselves, a climax of sorts to "phase one" of the cinematic universe. In other words, a possible finale, the "Avengers: Endgame" of the "Conjuring"-verse. Michael Chaves directed two of those slightly less popular recent sequels but was still retained as director of this one. The subtitle "Last Rites" ensured that everyone knew this was possibly the final movie. Since the Smurl case is chronologically the last of the Warrens' truly attention grabbing "investigations," it provided the basis for the sequel. 

This is the story invented for the sequel: Early in their ghost hunting career, Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated a haunted mirror. The incident was so traumatic that it pushed a very pregnant Lorraine into labor. Their daughter, Judy, arrived stillborn and nearly died, which the couple attributed to the evil spirits within the mirror. In 1985, the Warrens have basically retired from demon battling because of Ed's worsening heart condition. Judy is all grown up and engaged to a man named Tony. Around the same time, the aforementioned spooky mirror ends up in the home of the Smurl family in Pennsylvania, kicking off a horrifying series of events. Old friend of the Warrens, Father Gordon, is so distressed by what he encounters in the home that he commits suicide afterwards. This attracts Judy – who has been experiencing strange visions herself – to the Smurl residence. Her parents follow closely behind, discovering the haunting's connection to one of their earliest cases.

The best films in “The Conjuring” series still tend to feature more jump-scares, those loud and obnoxious jolts that sacrifice genuine tension for a quick jolt, than I'd prefer. The weaker ones rely almost entirely upon them, alongside too much CGI and ideas stolen from better movies. Chaves' first contributions to this cinematic universe, “The Curse of La Llorona” and “The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It,” were utterly kneecapped by this. His third film, “The Nun II,” was a little better. “Last Rites” does prove that the filmmaker and his team are capable of creating a genuinely eerie horror set-piece. My favorite moment in the sequel involves one of the Smurl daughters re-winding a home movie, in order to spot a demonic face in the grainy darkness of the footage. Her own face is reflected on the TV screen as each repetition comes. It's a well-done moment that builds nicely and plays off understandable anxieties, of our private moments and home being invaded by a malevolent outsider. Naturally, this scene immediately leads into a loud and very goofy sequence of a ghostly murder-hillbilly chasing the girl around the living room. So it too often goes with the “Conjuring” movies. 

There are a number of moments like that throughout the sequel. As the evil mirror is crushed in a trash truck, one of the Smurl daughters vomits up a torrent of blood, spraying it around the room. Judy stands in a mirrored room at a bridal shop, before a creaking open door allows in a malevolent spirit. In a set piece that feels like it could've been from one of the better “Omen” sequels, Father Gordon is harassed by demonic spirits in a gorgeously lit room. Any time a suitably tense or freaky feeling is established, it's immediately squandered on a big, loud special effect. “Last Rites,” in particular, seems to greatly miscalculate what is and isn't genuinely scary. It's spectral menace is a generic evil hag with a cartoonish clown grin, which made me chuckle every time it appeared. As the film goes on, it only gets sillier. The entire last act is a barrage of excruciatingly loud, CGI-driven spectacle. An eight foot tall version of Annabelle juts out of the darkness, there's a weak-as-piss revival of some “Exorcist” shenanigans, before the entire climax revolves around the evil mirror. Oh boy, does “The Conjuring: Last Rites” grossly overestimate how scary a mirror is. Even when you used computers to make it do all sorts of wacky shit. 

Much has been made of “Last Rites'” status as a send-off to the Ed and Lorraine that exist solely within these movies. Despite Patrick Wilson looking as yoked out as a 52 year old man could, the film repeatedly draws attention to Ed's worsening heart condition. You're expecting him to die by the end or something. Similarly, repeated references are made to Annabelle and Judy's connection to the demonic doll. Despite that, the sequel barely connects to any previous adventures. Considering the Disciples of the Ram – the Satanic cult present in the first “Annabelle” and third “Conjuring” flicks – seemed like they were being set-up as the Warrens' arch-nemesis, I was disappointed they are totally tossed out in favor of this lame-ass mirror. The script desperately attempts to make this last minute addition to “Conjuring”-verse lore into an enemy grand enough for a final movie. It simply doesn't work, instead feeling more like series architects David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick and James Wan – and the other two credited screenwriters – were out of ideas. 

It's something of a bummer too. Whatever merits these movies have, the chemistry between Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga remains adorable. It says a lot that some of the better moments in the film involve no demons or spectres at all. Instead, scenes of the two cooking pancakes or bantering around a dinner table prove far more charming. Farmiga and Wilson have played these ridiculous characters long enough that they feel fleshed-out and lived-in, despite mostly still being caricatures. The new additions to the Warren family here also prove unusually charming. Mia Tomlinson, as Judy, has got those diamond eyes and button nose that immediately makes you want to see her protected. Ben Hardy plays her fiance as a sincere dork who proves surprisingly likable. One of the biggest flaws of the sequel is that it splits time between the Warrens and the Smurls. Clearly, the former are the stars of the show but the latter motivate the plot. The actors playing the tormented family are fine, making them all seem like decent people, but their plight often feels pushed to the margin of the story. 

“Last Rites” ends with an extended epilogue, clearly designed to function as both a heart-felt goodbye to the cinematic Ed and Lorraine with call-backs to past adventures. It's also clearly a passing of the baton to a new team of heroes, should the franchise continue. Considering the fourth installment has already made more than its predecessor – and that the real life Tony Spera has kept his in-laws' grift going to this day – that seems extremely likely. (WB has already announced a streaming series, at the very least.) “Last Rites” is not the worst film to appear out of this very silly franchise, nor is it an especially riveting or frightening one. The leads are nice, it's got one or two moments, but the whole thing remains an immensely silly and self-serious affair. At least it's not as suffocating in its status as Catholic propaganda – the generic virtues of familial love taking precedence over the power of God – as the other ones. Hopefully whatever form the “Conjuring” universe takes next, it'll be about something more like that ghost werewolf and not a fuckin' scary mirror. [5/10]




Starting in 1963, Herschell Gordon Lewis would direct a series of garbage bag horror movies that made up for their lack of plausible storytelling, realistic acting, and professional camerawork by throwing a bunch of blood and guts around. The complete rejection of good taste evident in Lewis' films naturally attracted an audience. However, the novelty of sheep intestines heaped on Playboy bunnies had worn thin by 1967. HGL then started experimenting with other exploitation sub-categories. He dabbled in topics like LSD, biker gangs, all-girl rock groups, wife swapping, and the birth control pill. Emerging out of this period was “Just for the Hell of It,” the director's attempt to make a movie about teenage delinquents. (Which he did without casting any actual teenagers.) The resulting motion picture features the same mixture of technical incompetence and weird, outsider perspective as the rest of the filmmaker's output. 

Like most of Lewis' productions, “Just for the Hell of It” is set in a sunny, Floridian suburb. The otherwise idyllic town is beset by a group of rowdy youths who call themselves Destruction Incorporated. Led by the criminally insane Dexter, the group performs random acts of violence on any local unlucky enough to stumble into their path. In-between terrorizing people on the street, they throw wild parties, do drugs, and wreck small businesses. Why do they do this? For no apparent reason at all, perhaps other than to amuse themselves. Their victims are too frightened to testify against them, making the police powerless. Doug is a former member of Dexter's gang who has cleaned up his life, dating a nice girl named Jeanne. He is the only person willing to stand up to the troublemakers. His sense of justice makes him an enemy of the hellraisers, Dexter and his lackies soon deciding to make his life a living hell. 

“Just for the Hell of It,” without any production logos or opening credits, begins right away with a drawn-out scene of the juvenile delinquents wrecking an apartment. The scene goes on and on, shot in a mix of static medium shots and shaky, handheld close-ups. The titles finally begin, playing out over a montage of the kids attacking random people around town. Over the scene, an extremely goofy folk-rock song plays. This, in fact, is how most of the film plays out. Dexter's gang get into fist fights in dinners and wreck them. They spray paint “FUZZ GO AWAY” on a wall. They very gently place a woman's baby in a trash can before smashing her baby carriage to pieces. An old lady is sprayed with a hose, a blind man beat up, a guy on crutches attacked, a newspaper is set on fire without the woman reading it noticing. Many of these montages of destruction are set to that same warbling, repetitive song. All of it is done with the resources, budget, and skills we've come to expect from Herschell Gordon Lewis. Which is to say very little.

The movie was obviously an attempt by its director to cash-in on the cultural hysteria around the hippy movement. The theme song refers to the violent teens as hairy animals and one of the bystanders decries them as “monkeys.” Except these rebel-rousers don't have long hair. They don't appear unshaved, unwashed or even somewhat slightly dazed. They have cleanly cropped hair cuts and wear tucked-in and button-down shirts. This is undoubtedly an exploitation movie. Three teenage girls are lured to one of the gang's party, presumably sexually assaulted, and intimidated into not reporting to the incident. A random blonde on a beach is raped while the hero's girlfriend gets violently brutalized. However, in a rare display of tact, Lewis doesn't include any nudity in these moments. Which surely would've been permissible by 1968. The hokey soundtrack feels very much like a hopelessly out-of-step square attempting to replicate what the kids were listening to. The dialogue is a hilariously awkward attempt to copy contemporary slang. What hippy would call the cops “fuzz” and not “pigs?” These riotous teens rarely do drugs, never have on-screen sex, and seem unusual gentle with what chaos they do reap. 

As it often does, the odd mixture of tedium, do-it-yourself scrapiness, camp, and mean-spirited violence makes “Just for the Hell of It” nearly as hypnotic and entombing as Lewis' more notorious motion pictures. Most of the movie is composed of the aforementioned montages, making this nearly eighty whole minutes of nothing but senseless destruction. The plot is thin as can be, Dexter's rivalry with Doug not being introduced until the eighteen minute mark and only cropping up a few other times before the end. This makes “Just for the Hell of It” feel as nihilistic as the teenage psychopaths it is about. The ending, as slapdash as the rest of the production, is downbeat in its abruptness. A brief epilogue has a character clarifying that none of this matters, before a final reprise of the theme song assures us that no moral can be taken from this telling. I'm sure Mr. Lewis was simply being as crass and commercial as ever. People wanted movies about the kids not being alright and going wild in the streets? Lewis was going to give them that and nothing else. However, the filmmaker's sheer inability to ever aspire to higher art almost makes “Just for the Hell of It” a statement on hedonistic mayhem for its own sake. Few other movies about meaningless violence feel quite as meaningless as this. 

Naturally, the acting is stilted and otherworldly. Ray Sager, the future Montag the Magnificent, plays Dexter as a weirdly vamping marionette while everyone else are stiff as boards. The filmmaking craft on display is rough. When the gang destroys the diner, its owner seems to yell at them from an entirely separate dimension. Aside from that cornball theme song, the soundtrack is composed of jazzy dissonance and random electronic farts. There are unexpected bursts of artier touches, shots of the unhinged antagonists giggling in brightly colored cutaways. It's not as funny as HGL's better remembered horror movies. Nor as weird as, well, “Something Weird.” Often boring or annoying, “Just for the Hell of It” is still too fascinatingly fixated on the idea of senseless violence not to be somewhat interesting and too miscalculated in its attempt to say hello to the fellow kids not to entertain. [5/10]
 


Quinn Martin's Tales of the Unexpected: The Force of Evil

If you say the words “Tales of the Unexpected” to most fans of classic genre television, they will probably assume you are talking about the British series that ran from 1979 to 1988. That Roald Dahl-hosted program did air in the U.S. as well, in syndication throughout the eighties. However, if you're talking to a real hardcore anthology aficionado, they might recall an earlier, American “Tales of the Unexpected.” This one was produced by the prolific Quinn Martin, of “A Quinn Martin Production” fame, going so far as to include his name above the title. (Providing a convenient way to differentiate it from the identically named program that began two years later.) This “Tales” aired for five hour long episodes in 1977, getting crushed in the ratings by “Charlie's Angels” and “Baretta.” I guess, as some sort of stunt to raise ratings, the sixth episode took the form of a feature length special. If that was the intention, it didn't work. The show went on hiatus for sixth months before burning off the last two episodes in August. The longer episode, entitled “The Force of Evil,” would eventually be released on VHS as a stand-alone movie. Along with a handful of other “Tales,” it now floats around the internet as blurry uploads. 

“Force of Evil” follows Dr. Yale Carrington, a beloved husband to Maggie and father to two kids, John and Maggie. Seven years earlier, the crematorium operator at the hospital named Teddy Jakes raped and murdered a girl. He came to Dr. Carrington, asking him to provide an alibi. The doctor refused and Jakes went away for the crime. Now, however, he is out on parole. Jakes begins to show up at the doctor's office. He harasses Maggie in the parking lot of the grocery store. The family's stables burn down mysteriously and a friend of Maggie is struck by a boat while jet-skiing, both crimes attribute to Jakes. Carrington has his brother, the town sheriff, put some pressure on Jakes but it only increases his stalking. The doctor takes justice into his own hands, poisoning Jakes' daily insulin, and dropping his body down a well... This does not stop the man's will to torment Yale Carrington and his family, his vengeance continuing from beyond the grave. 

The few times retrospective reviews of Martin's “Tales of the Unexpected” pop up, it is usually criticized for a perceived lack of creativity. The episode “The Nomads” is a direct remake of the pilot of earlier Martin series, “The Invaders.” Another episode, “A Hand for Sonny Grey,” transplants the old “Hands of Orlac” premise into the world of baseball. Then there's “Force of Evil” which is, to put it kindly, an extended homage to “Cape Fear.” To put it bluntly, it's a direct rip-off. The profession of the main character is changed from a lawyer to a doctor and the location is shifted from the deep south to the American southwest. Otherwise, the similarities are hard to ignore. It's not only the general set-up of a now paroled rapist harassing the family of the man he blames for his imprisonment. In both “Cape Fear” and this episode, the protagonist has the local police pressure the crook, only for that plan to backfire. While in prison, Teddy Jakes read up on law books, much the way Max Cady did. Most blatantly, the climax of “Force of Evil” also sees the family man, his wife, and daughter hiding out on a house boat, only for the assailant to follow them and set the boat adrift from the dock. The episode is credited to Robert Malcolm Young, without acknowledging John D. MacDonald's original novel or James R. Webb's screenplay, but it seems implausible to me that the parallels are coincidence. 

Part of what makes “Cape Fear” a compelling story is how the hero is constantly tempted to violently strike back at his stalker but ultimately shows himself to be morally superior. This is not present in “Force of Evil.” Dr. Carrington and his wife outright plot to murder Teddy Jakes, going so far as to hide his body. This does insert a new angle to the telling. Jakes is a vile man, a remorseless predator who delights in intimidating and terrifying his enemies. However, Carrington taking the law into his own hands, setting out to murder Jakes, at least makes the man's revenge understandable. This could have been built into a meditation on the nature of justice, what constitutes self-defense exactly, and how people consolidate their moral compass. “Force of Evil” doesn't really get into that though, leaving the morality of its protagonist mostly unexamined. The supernatural element that is also hinted at never amounts to much either. The script seems to confirm that Jakes is dead half-way through, his body being dragged out of the well, while also flirting with the possibility that he simply somehow survived the assassination attempt. It's all very vague and half-assed. 

There's some suggestion that “The Force of Evil” could have been a little more than a low-rent TV rip-off of a classic film. Lloyd Bridges stars as Carrington and makes for a sympathetic protagonist. He has good chemistry with Pat Crowley as his wife. William Watson is especially effective as Teddy Jakes, putting off a greasy kind of charisma while also coming across as a totally repugnant human being. You can see how he would be able to con his way into various scenarios while never forgetting what a threat he is. Cinematographer Paul Lohmann has some notable other credits, such as “Coffy,” “The White Buffalo,” and a few Mel Brooks movies. He occasionally adopts a cock-eyed visual direction, adding an uneasy tension to a few moments. Despite these strengths, “Touch of Evil” is sluggishly paced throughout. This story truly did not need to be almost two hours. Moreover, the characters are all thinly written, leaving the talented cast little room to expand on the material. 

As the title implies, there is something of a twist ending here. More like an ambiguous ending, to be frank. It is mildly interesting. William Conrad provides opening and closing narration, as he did on a few other Martin productions, which helps this feel more like a proper anthology series. However, if this represents the overall quality of this “Tales of the Unexpected,” it's not hard to see why it didn't catch on. “Force of Evil” goes out of its way to remind the viewer of superior material while never grappling with the moral themes it brings up or weirder ideas batted around by the script. “Quinn Martin's Tales of the Unexpected” does seem fondly remembered by some seventies nostalgists. Stephen King shouted the show out in “Danse Macabre,” his non-fiction essay on the horror genre... Except the scenario he describes is actually from an episode of “Ghost Story,” meaning this series actually has zero cultural legacy. Good theme song though. [5/10]



The Addams Family: Fester Goes on a Diet

“The Addams Family” is not a show that you would refer to as topical most of the time. However, “Fester Goes on a Diet” roots itself to the late sixties in two specific ways. The main plot involves Uncle Fester receiving news that Yvette, his latest pen pal from France, will be visiting him soon. After Pugsley is caught exercising, in hopes of impressing his own lady friend and much to his parents' horror, Fester gets the idea to loose some weight himself. He consults fitness guru Jack LaLanne – whose eponymous show was already fifteen years into its 34 run by 1966 – and quickly gets on the exercise regiment supposedly used by U.S. astronauts. That last detail leads Gomez and Morticia to believe that Fester has been selected to be an astronaut, the two quickly becoming fearful that his electric physicality would be dangerous within the high-oxygen environment of a space shuttle. The Saturn IB round of Apollo missions would start shortly after this episode aired, which is probably why the topic was on the show writers' minds. The episode does not end with Fester going into outer space, which he wouldn't accomplish until he started fighting aliens in 1989. 

You never know if older programs such as this will hold up to modern standards. By which I mean I was worried this episode would be full of fat jokes. “The Addams Family” has rarely used Jackie Coogan or Ken Weatherwax's physical appearances as the butt of jokes but you never know. It was the sixties, man. Thankfully, “Fester Goes on a Diet” doesn't mock either actor for their appearance much. The idea of Pugsley getting into weight training is a joke because his parents are aghast that their child would be into something wholesome like exercise, not because he's a husky kid. Jack LaLanne, beloved pop culture figure though he might have been, was not much of an actor. He does deliver a few stiff lines about Fester's appearance. However, most of the humor is derived from the weirdness of the uncle's body, not his weight. Fester's attempts at knee bends or arm reps go wrong because he's more like a corpse than your average person. It's goofy physical comedy, not mockery of a fat guy. The ending – fairly easy to predict – could even be read as fat-positive through a 2025 lens, though unintentionally. Still, I didn't cringe much.

In fact, “Fester Goes on a Diet” is a fairly amusing episode. Once again, season two gets some decent mileage out of pairing up characters that haven't interacted much before. I don't recall Fester and Lurch having too many scenes together before this. When Fester tells the butler that his lady friend will be paying him a visit soon, the stocky man-servant's unusually vocal reaction got a good laugh out of me. So did some of the shenanigans of the two attempting to exercise together. Once Yvette appears in the last act, there's a solid gag based of Fester attempting to replicate Gomez' passion for French. A doctor is called in to give Fester a physical, which gets a little more weird than your standard joke of an outsider reacting with horror to the family's antics. Also, there's a cool shot of some fog billowing through the house, the result of Fester using a sarcophagus as a steam bath. Ya know, how come there's not more fog on this show? I'd say the Addams and the Munsters are about evenly matched in most regards but Herman and Lily definitely have the moodier abode. I guess gratuitous amounts of cobwebs and dust and a grand staircase say “haunted house” to me more than a moose head, a fireman's pole, and a two-headed turtle. No offense meant to any of the latter, of course. [7/10]


Saturday, October 5, 2024

Halloween 2024: October 5th



How well known is Herschell Gordon Lewis outside the realm of sicko horror fans? Probably not all that much. The outrageous, if deeply unconvincing, gore of his movies and the strangely hypnotic quality of his slipshod productions makes his work, one imagines, utterly unappealing to anyone without a taste for Z-budget trash cinema or an interest in the history of American exploitation films. However, the fans of Lewis' bloody anti-masterpieces do include some high-profile filmmakers. John Waters including a clip from “Blood Feast” in “Serial Mom” probably introduced a lot of people to the Godfather of Gore. Similarly, an entire generation likely learned about H.G.L. when Diablo Cody had Juno watch “The Wizard of Gore” and declare it better than “Suspiria.” If any Lewis production has penetrated the wider cultural zeitgeist, the way the demented villains of his films have penetrated the bodies of so many victims, it's probably that one. I was underwhelmed by “Wizard of Gore” when I went through my own edgy teenage era and have never revisited it since, unlike the other Lewis movies I actively enjoy. More than enough time has passed for me to reconsider this one and determine if I think it's better than “Suspiria” too or if Juno MacGuff was a fucking idiot. 

A stage magician named Montag the Magnificent begins to attract quite a following because of his grotesquely violent performances. Montag takes volunteers from the audience and brutally dismembers them right on stage, before everyone's eyes. Afterwards, the people the viewers saw horribly murdered appear totally fine. However, the ghastly wounds Montag's “illusions” wreak on his victims have a tendency to catch up with them a few hours later. Talk show host Sherry Carson becomes fascinated with Montag. She drags her boyfriend, journalist Jack, to see his act several times. The two begin to wonder if Montag is himself the murderer or if his violent act is merely inspiring a copycat psychopath. Sherry ultimately invites Montag onto her talk show, exposing a mass audience to the Wizard of Gore's phantasmic violence.

Many horror films, over the years, have been accused of being nothing but an excuse for a series of elaborate, gory special effects sequence. This is usually an extremely unfair statement to make but it's actually fairly accurate when it comes to Herschell Gordon Lewis movies. With “The Wizard of Gore,” a director who never had much in the way of pretenses abandons even those. The meat of this motion picture – if you'll excuse a pun – is made up of Montag's bloody on-stage executions. He chainsaws a girl in half and hammers a spike into another girl's head until her eyeball pops out. Sword swallowing becomes a gruesome display and an industrial hole punch machine is applied to human flesh. Each of these gore scenes are accomplished largely by tossing fake blood and animal intestines onto the actors. As always, the effect is sickening if laughably unrealistic. The fake heads or body parts used could never be mistaken for the real thing. 

Usually, the crudeness of Lewis' gore effects are an indicator of the overall quality of his productions. The shotgun blunt editing, awkward framing, wooden acting, surreal dialogue, overwhelming musical scores, and incoherent scripts frequently combine to make accidentally charming oddball experiences. The director had been making movies for a decade by the time he got to “The Wizard of Gore,” at least his thirty-first directorial credit. Lewis' skills hadn't improved much in all that time but, hard as it is to believe, “Wizard of Gore” is probably one of his more polished productions. The framing is mostly on-center. The editing is not too inept. The musical score never drowns out the dialogue. The scenes of heroine Sherry and her boyfriend talking feature baffling dialogue that quickly becomes hilarious, to the point that it feels intentional. “The Wizard of Gore” certainly still contains that perversely charming anti-charisma that defines the filmmaker's best work. Compared to “Blood Feast” though, it functions more like a real movie! Lewis clearly learned something from “A Taste of Blood,” keeping the tedious scenes of people talking in boardrooms to a minimum. 

When I first saw “Wizard of Gore” as a teenager, it having less shoddy production values than Lewis' other movies was actually a mark against it. My taste have, indeed, evolved some in the years since. “The Wizard of Gore” is still a fascinating excursion into H.G.L.'s inexplicable story logic. There's a meandering subplot about Montag stealing bodies from the graveyard and morgue, usually depicted in red-tinted dream scenes I think, that never go anywhere. The exact mechanics of the villain's powers are never defined. No motive for his murderous actions is established. The script is largely composed of repetitive dialogue scenes, as the heroes bumble towards having some sort of confrontation with Montag. A reoccurring image of blood dripping from hands is the script's best attempt at foreshadowing and it doesn't make any damn sense at all. The result is as stupefying and mesmerizing as Lewis' best – or “best” anyway – movies are.  The gore auteur was never after more than making a quick buck but, sometimes, that accidentally resulted in art of some kind. 

At least, that was what Lewis always claimed anyway. If you watch enough of his films, you see that he was more creatively invested in his horror movies than his statements to the contrary imply. “The Wizard of Gore” contains what I think might be an attempt at themes. Montag's grandiose monologues, delivered with some actual campy flair by Ray Sager, go on and on about the nature of reality and fantasy, of performance and genuine action. This leads towards an incoherent, and quite funny, non-twist that sums up the movie's frequent dream-like atmosphere. However, Lewis was clearly going for something here. How Montag's supposedly fake acts of violence then result in real acts of violence seems like loose commentary on the nature of filmmaking itself. Moviemaking presents fake images to the viewer as if they were real, which Montag does to his own audience. That the villain is hypnotizing all his customers into seeing something other than objective reality is comparable to how the moving image tricks us into believing the unreal, if only for a second. Moreover, the magician's criticism of people being drawn to watch violent acts feels like biting-the-hand comments directed at the sickos who watch the director's films. Despite his clear lack of aesthetic talent, all of this suggests Lewis was extremely self-aware. 

That thematic thread has made “The Wizard of Gore” one of the better reviewed of Lewis' gore movies. It also led to a shockingly pretentious remake, which I'll probably have to review some day because Crispin Glover hams it up as Montag. The first time I watched this one, I was definitely into it more for the unintentional laughs than the ruminations on the nature of reality, fantasy, violence, and movie-making. As an adult, these ideas do tickle my brain. When wrapped up in the usual lack of plausible special effects, narrative coherence, or sturdy visuals, it makes “The Wizard of Gore” as bewitchingly inscrutable an experience as anything else the Godfather of Gore unleashed on the world. “Two Thousand Maniacs” is more coherent in its ideas, “Something Weird” is crazier and “Blood Feast” is funnier. Still, “The Wizard of Gore” ranks up there as one of the director's more brain-itch-inducing films. Better than “Suspiria?” Fuck no, what kind of crack was Juno smoking? But I did like it. [7/10]



Sayehaye bolande bad

Not a lot of horror movies come out of what we, as Americans, think of as "the Middle East." There is, without a doubt, a cinematic legacy in the Persian Gulf. Iran, in particular, has an active and healthy film industry. Iranian art dramas often play festivals and get picked up by global distributors. This still only represents a small fraction of the commercial filmmaking done in the country, most of which is rarely exported. Horror usually falls under that banner. That means the handful of Iranian genre films that do exist are difficult to find, much less with English subtitles. A few examples have made it over here though. Probably the most acclaimed Iranian horror film is Bahman Farmanara's 1979 folk tale, "Tall Shadows of the Wind." Made in the midst of the Islamic Revolution, the film was quickly banned by the government and remained obscure for years. Rediscovered by scholars more recently, the film has had many repertoire screenings. A DVD with subtitles must've been released at some point and that print – a bit dark and washed-out but watchable – circulates on the usual corners of the internet. 

The residents of an isolated village in the Iranian countryside erect a scarecrow at the edge of town. They assign mystical beliefs to the sentry, praying to it to protect them. Abdullah, the town bus driver, has engine trouble one day. He wanders up to the scarecrow and, casually, draws a face similar to his own on it. Afterwards, people around town report having frightening encounters with the scarecrow. It is said to appear in the shadows, causing women to have miscarriages, driving the elderly to madness, and forcing some to perform bizarre rituals. The village is soon paralyzed with fear of the entity. Abdullah and his friend, school teacher Mohammad, remain skeptical. With everyone else too frightened to stand up against this supernatural overseer, Abdullah takes it upon himself to stop it. 

Early on in "Tall Shadows of the Wind," there is a long sequence of lingering shots of the castle overlooking the village while sounds of people chanting play over it. This immediately establishes an eerie atmosphere. We never see the scarecrow actually move on-screen. Instead, it simply appears in different locations. Its presence is suggested with shadows or far-off sounds of something moving. This removes any campy element from the premise. Instead of being a cheesy killer scarecrow movie, this becomes a chilling depiction of how madness and fear can grip a community. The supernatural entity doesn't murder. Instead, it terrorizes the psyche. An old woman is driven to get up and walk, a bundle of sticks on her back, for no reason. A young girl brings it water, while another couple is awoken in the night by the idol stalking outside their home. This is a terror that is inexplicable. Nobody knows where it came from or how to stop it. To Abdollah, all he sees is a figure made of sticks and discarded clothes. Everyone else in town imbues this symbol with an ominous meaning and it drives them all towards madness.

The result is a horror film where the horror is vague, more implied than shown. While that might've been tedious in lesser hands, Farmanara establishes a dream-like ambiance early on. "Tall Shadows of the Wind" is an often quiet film, devoted to people having soft conversations in dimly lit interiors. This is contrasted with an expressive score, that switches between creeping melodies and more bombastic sounds. The film seesaws between these two modes, quiet and hysterical, in the way a nightmare can suddenly change for reasons that can't be understood. Cinematographer Ali Reza Zarrindast often places the actors as small figures in large landscapes, against the flatness of the desert or the wide blue sky. Other times, slow tracking shots are used. Combined, it makes the characters feel like insignificant pawns in a larger game that are always watched by an omniscient force. It goes a long way towards further establishing an ominous tone, where otherworldly powers loom over the common folk. 

Nearly every plot synopsis I can find of "Tall Shadows of the Wind" mentions that it is a direct allegory for the political situation in Iran when it was made. More than one source claims the film is largely a critique of the Pahlavi monarchy that ruled the country before the revolution. There are apparently specific references and criticism of Shi'ite beliefs, which also got the movie banned by Khomeini's government. The film is based on a story by Houshang Golshiri, an Iranian author arrested at one point for his communist beliefs. Naturally, as a dumb-ass American who didn't live through these geopolitical events, most of this stuff went over my head. The climatic dream sequence, of people clad in red marching against the black dressed scarecrows, definitely strikes me as symbolism I lack the cultural context to grasp. However, some themes are universal. "Tall Shadows of the Wind" is about entrusting in something to protect you, only to have it turn against you in time. The same power the people of the village grant the scarecrow, by believing in its abilities, also allows it to terrorize them. This is a scenario recognizable to anyone with a minute's awareness of history. Those we entrust to keep us safe have a bad habit of abusing that trust. "Tall Shadows of the Wind" is about what was happening in Iran in the late seventies, yes. "Who watches the watchmen?" is still a sentiment anyone can understand. 

"Tall Shadows of the Wind" is also a prime example of folk horror. I discovered the film thanks to the "Woodlands Dark and Days Bewitched" documentary, where a lot of people probably heard of it for the first time, I bet. Aside from clearly being rooted in specific cultural beliefs of the time and the place, the film is rich with the rural, isolated feeling that exemplifies the subgenre. A community imbuing a scarecrow with ominous powers through their belief in it is an act of mass folk magik. And scarecrows always seem like pagan idols to me, crucified figures looming over the harvest. I guess what I'm saying is... No, I did not understand everything about "Tall Shadows of the Wind." If I did have the cultural knowledge and experiences to grasp what the film suggests, the narrative approach would remain vague and detached. Simply taken as a work of poetic, foreboding mood, it is a compelling and chilling film. Its themes of power, community, and rebellion speaks to anyone. An HD restoration exists, hopefully meaning a proper physical release with all the bells and whistles isn't far off. (This seems like the kind of title Criterion would prioritize.) I'm glad I watched the film, an effective and eerie experience, and now I'm eager to search out some other Iranian horror flicks. [7/10]



Freddy's Nightmares: Sister's Keeper

"Freddy's Nightmares" was not a consistent show, not in quality or construction. Freddy Krueger only acted as a host to the series' stories... Except in eight episodes, which feature him directly involved in the plots. Most installments presented stand alone tales... Except for eleven, that operated as sequels to earlier ones. Finally, nearly every "Nightmare" was split between different tales... Except for two, which devoted a whole hour to their premises. "Sister's Keeper," the seventh episode of the first season, breaks all three of these rules. It follows Lisa and Merit, the twin daughters of the guy Freddy sought revenge on in the series' pilot. Neurotic Merit continues to have nightmares about Freddy, so much that she's spent some time in a mental ward. Popular Lisa simply wants to move on her with life. One day, feeling bad for Merit, the two twins switch places. The sisters also sometimes share physical sensations and dreams. Once Lisa begins having nightmares about Freddy too, the sisters decide to work together to banish the killer once and for all. Will it be enough?

Previous times I've watched "Freddy's Nightmares," I've found it to be an exceedingly lackluster series. Shooting on grainy video tape made every episode look incredibly cheap, a perception further bolstered by usually underwhelming special effects. Too often, the show's dream-centric set-up led to stories ending in incoherent ways. All of these factors are evident in "Sister's Keeper." The script indecisively juggles multiple concepts. The idea of the twins sharing sensations, some sort of "Corsican Brothers" situation, comes and goes from the story. Twin sisters switching places is a clever set-up. (I actually knew sisters in high school who did that exact thing from time to time.) Lisa being so cruel to Merit so often makes it hard to imagine she'd willingly switch places with her. All of these ideas are dropped by the final act, which focuses on the girls sharing dreams and teaming up to stop Freddy, an emotional connection not earned by anything that has come before. 

Meanwhile, every attempt "Sister's Keeper" makes at scaring the viewer comes off as utterly inept. There's some nice colorful lighting in the nightmare sequences, undermined as it is by the shitty video quality. The dream scenes themselves, however, come off as more comedic than anything. Merit dreams that the guitar playing foot fetishist with a crush on her turns into Freddy, a hysterically goofy scene. He's jumping around, shredding on a flying V. It's so goofy! A moment of Lisa getting tossed down the stairs at school by the dream Merit is having about Freddy is similarly awkward. A bed sheet coming to life and holding Merit down is not exactly terrifying. The finale features Freddy's arm extending outwards to grab both sisters, which looks incredibly rubbery and shitty. I've made this comparison before but "Freddy's Nightmares" genuinely did have the production values of an eighties porno as well as the stilted, uncomfortable, and unprofessional look and feel of one. 

This is especially evident in the acting. I don't want to be a dick about this but Gry and Hili Park are simply dreadful as Merit and Lisa. Their delivery is monotone and every attempt at emoting comes off as stiff. That the writing is bad certainly doesn't help. Robert Englund can make campy gold out of the thinnest straw but he seems uncertain here. It doesn't help that the main character is named Merit. What the hell kind of name is that?! They repeat it, over and over again! Exactly one scene is good. Freddy appears in Lisa's bed and mocks her virginal sister for her lack of experience and jealousy of her more popular sister. That has Krueger playing on the fears and insecurities of his teenage victims, which is what he's always done best. Otherwise, "Sister's Keeper" is an embarrassing, tedious hour of television that will only interest die-hard Fred Heads. Which I guess I must be, as I keep watching this show despite knowing it's bad. [4/10] 



The Addams Family: Morticia the Breadwinner

Every iteration of the Addams Family is fabulously wealthy but "Morticia the Breadwinner" is an episode that suggests their resources have their limits. Uncle Fester reports to Morticia that stocks are crashing all over Wall Street. Concerned for the family's financial stability, she organizes everyone to cook up side hustles in order to bring in some extra cash... Without informing Gomez, who has become stuck on the idea of buying up a failing train company in a swampland. After every other plan the other Addams present doesn't get far, Morticia unknowingly ends up in a bid to sell her own shares in the train company to her husband. 

Considering the overall absurdity of the Addams' ridiculous wealth – a prior episode saw them attempting to spend billions on their own space program, while another suggested Gomez has priceless diamonds laying around – it's difficult to take the idea of them running out of savings too seriously. This premise is clearly an excuse to create more wacky interactions between the Addams and more traditional folks. Such as a very broad scene where Wednesday and Pugsley open their own version of a lemonade stand, selling hemlock to an unsuspecting passerby. Or Granmama offering beauty tips to saloons. It's the main joke of the series, the Addams doing their macabre thing when normalcy is expected from everyone outside the family, simply going in a slightly different direction than usual. 

By far the strangest of these attempts is Fester and Lurch trying to start an "escort agency." At first, I figured this phrase must have meant something different back in 1964. Surely, these characters on this goofy old sitcom weren't discussing talking up prostitution? Later scenes make the implications clear. Fester practices celebrity impersonations to impress his "dates" – which goes about as well as you'd expect – while a pair of ladies later refer to them as "gigolos." All I can assume is that audiences at the time were deeply naïve about what paying someone to spend time with you actually entails. Obviously, the fact that the clients of any sex work are overwhelmingly going to be men wasn't going to occur to anyone back then. Instead, this episode puts the mental image of Uncle Fester doing some rough trade into our brains before moving onto the next set of gags. 

In general, it's a weird premise for an episode. Especially considering Gomez has, in the past, been delighted by his financial endeavors failing. Most of this idea, especially Morticia refusing to tell her husband about it, strikes me as deeply contrived. Having said all that, I did laugh a few times. Such as Fester practicing his dynamite skills on the family safe. Or the cute result of Morticia's attempt to start a fencing instructional course. Granted, this is another episode that ends with a phone call but at least we see both sides of the conversation this time. [5/10]


Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Halloween 2023: October 25th



The blockbuster success of “Fatal Attraction” would essentially birth a whole new subgenre. The domestic thriller would combine psychological suspense and family-centric melodrama, usually with sprinklings of the slasher movie or eroticism. In these films, it's not just human life that is being threatened. Instead, the main element in peril is the sanctity of the white, upper-middle class, suburban family. The safety of the homestead, the innocence of the children, and the holy union of marriage were endangered by unhinged mistresses, teenage femme fatales, psycho neighbors, and clingy exes. Usually, it was a man's philandering ways that brought this problem among the family, the husband being punished for his misdeeds. Yet at least one example made the subtext of the domestic thriller actual text. “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” would feature a deranged nanny with a grudge attempting to steal the most precious thing a screenwriter could imagine a woman having in the 90s: A loving family. 

Claire Bartel is expecting her second child with her beloved husband, Michael. She visits a new obstetrician, who molests her on the examine table. Claire reports the incident, prompting other women to come forward. The resulting shame leads Dr. Mott to kill himself, which causes his wife, Peyton, to have a miscarriage. Nine months later, Claire gives birth to a baby boy, Joe. After a chance meeting, Claire hires Peyton to be the new nanny, unaware of who she really is. Peyton goes about integrating herself into the family, getting Joe and daughter Emma depended on her. She pushes away other family friends, like neurodivergant handyman Solomon and Michael's best friend. As Peyton plots to ruin Claire's life and steal her family, the housewife starts to realize she is in danger.

“The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” was written by a woman. Amanda Silver went on to write “The Relic” and work on a number of high-profile blockbusters. If you're expecting a notable name like that to produce a smart screenplay, think again. “The Hands That Rocks the Cradle” features some of the most obvious plotting I've seen in a big, Hollywood movie. The first act goes out of its way to remove any ambiguity about Peyton's motivations. The exact origins of her grudge against the Bartels is breathlessly detailed. Normally, you'd expect a movie like this to save the reasons for the villain's scheme as a last act reveal. Instead, “Hand That Rocks the Cradle” puts it all on the table immediately. In fact, all of Peyton's schemes are projected far in advance. Often, the movie will set-up her latest action and have it play out right away. It's kind of like the script is telling us what the character is going to do, right before she does it.

As dumb as “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle's” script is, the movie is gifted with a delightfully petty villainess. Rebecca De Mornay plays Peyton, from the minute she appears at the Bartels' house, with an unhinged gleam in her eyes. She's obviously evil, right from the get-go. A mere few scenes after entering the home, Peyton is breast-feeding baby Joey. Yet De Mornay is so amusing. She verbally attacks a child or Solomon, delivering brutal dialogue with an ice-cold venom in her voice. Her attempts to befriend Emma or seduce Michael are so transparently wicked, yet De Mornay's wide-eyed villainy is never less than totally entertaining. 

If De Mornay's performance is obviously camp, it takes the rest of the movie around her a while to catch up. Director Curtis Hanson – whose incredibly random career would begin with schlock like this before he worked his way up to respectable films like “L.A. Confidential” and “Wonder Boys” – makes many of the early scenes feel like something out a wholesome, family drama. Especially the scenes revolving around Ernie Hudson as Solomon, a hilariously patronizing character, or the aggressively adorable Madeline Zima as Emma. The Bartel household is depicted as so angelically perfect, that it's hard to imagine anyone disrupting their joy. As “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” goes on, it becomes more ridiculous. Implausible greenhouse murder and De Mornay getting punched across a room proceeds a last act that barrels towards full-blown hysterics. Peyton starts swinging a shovel around like its Jason Voorhee's machete, going full homicidal and dueling it out with Claire. At this point, “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” finally reaches the levels of delectable trash it was always meant to operate on.

The domestic thriller was red hot in 1992 and “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” would become a hit that year. It stayed atop the box office for four weeks, despite being buried in the middle of January. Audiences just couldn't get enough of family disrupting stalker psychos at the time. It goes to show too how much the slasher formula had been integrated into mainstream thrillers by this point, when overcooked schlock like this could be given the glossy, big budget sheen. “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” has neither the directorial skills of “Fatal Attraction” nor the Gothic nuance of “Single White Female.” A filmmaker of the caliber of Adrien Lynn, Barbet Schroeder, or Paul Verhoeven would've put this material through the roof. As it is, the film is too outrageous not to be highly entertaining and gets better the more it embraces its inherent trashiness. [7/10]




Herschell Gordon Lewis never had any pretensions about the kind of movies he made. He was a true exploitation filmmaker, in the business to make a quick buck and nothing more. The often inept quality of his films reflected this mercenary attitude. Despite all that, Lewis must've had some longing in his heart to make real art. In 1967, the Godfather of Gore would try his hand at a slightly classier type of horror movie than the fake blood filled quickies he usually specialized in. “A Taste of Blood” was Herschell Gordon Lewis' stab at making an epic, with a story that spanned the globe and a run time that extended to two hours. To further display his genuine artistic ambitions for this one, Lewis would draw inspiration from that classic piece of horror literature, Bram Stoker's “Dracula.”

Miami businessman John Stone fills his days playing golf and canoodling with his bombshell wife, Helene. That all changes when he receives a strange gift: Two cases of fine brandy from Moldova, sent by a recently deceased relative. Upon drinking from the bottles, which are actually filled with blood, Stone begins to change. He starts to hypnotize Helene, while wearing a large, distinctive ring. He travels to England, to drive a stake through the heart of a low-ranking lord. Stone has had his ancient ancestry, that of none other than Count Dracula, awoken. He is now on a quest to avenge the Count's death, murdering the descendants of Arthur Holmwood, Quincy Morris, and Abraham Van Helsing. It's up to the modern day Van Helsing and a bevy of other heroes to save Helene and stop Stone.

Even fans of Herschell Gordon Lewis' films could never accuse them of being especially polished. The shoddy quality of his work is part of the appeal, Lewis' lack of formal cinematic skill making his movies into accidental outsider art. However, Lewis' incompetence resulted in even his best movies having dragging paces. This is less of a problem in something like “Blood Feast,” which runs all of an hour, or the likes of “Two Thousand Maniacs” or “The Gore Gore Girls,” which rarely go more than a few minutes without some ridiculous gore gag. “A Taste of Blood,” however, has aspirations of art and actually contains a quasi-coherent narrative. What this translates to is many scenes of guys in suits, standing around in bland boarding rooms, and talking among themselves. When combined with a two hour run time, the result is a movie that is slow as molasses. “A Taste of Blood” grinds on and on, the monotonous score moaning on, rarely feeling like the story is actually progressing much. 

I suppose H.G.L must've been a horror fan, even though I imagine he was drawn to the genre more so because it's highly marketable. “A Taste of Blood” suggests he did long to make a classy – or classier anyway – vampire movie. The film often feels like Lewis' take on a Hammer or Bava movie. The scenes of the vampirized John lurking over a sleeping maiden's bed, blue lights shining on his face, must be the micro-budget attempts to emulate “Horror of Dracula” and the likes. Star Bill Rogers even looks and sounds a little like Christopher Lee. Of course, Lewis had none of the talent of Terence Fisher or Bava. There's plenty of awkward camerawork, shotgun editing, and super-fake blood here. Yet Herschell was definitely trying here. You can see a trace of style, even of motion and movement, in some of “A Taste of Blood's” more tolerable scenes.

Unfortunately, most of the movie is not that interesting. “A Taste of Blood” ostensibly has a global story. Stone hitches a ride on a boat to England, killing the Holmwood descendent there, and also spends some time in Texas. Don't think for a minute that Lewis actually had the movie to lens an ocean-hopping story though. Far too much of “A Taste of Blood” are set in drab, Florida boardrooms. Even when heading to England, the movie mostly resorts to the vampire sitting across from a guy in a chair, talking things out. The movie's biggest set piece is a sleepy chase through a topiary maze and the vampire boarding a boat. (Where Lewis has a comical cameo as a Limey Seaman, sporting a ludicrous accent.) Moments like these really make you miss a bloody barrel road or someone jumping into the back of a garbage truck. 

In other words, Herschell Gordon Lewis' incredibly limited budget and even more limited talent really caught up with him on this one. “A Taste of Blood” is most entertaining when Lewis returns to familiar ground. Such as when the vampire stalks a burlesque dancer at a strip club or attacks a woman dipping into the pool. There's some weird touches, like a random guy walking his dog helping to save the day or Stone weaponizing a pool queue. Overall though, this is a painfully slow and largely uneventful effort. Lewis referred to “a Taste of Blood” as his masterpiece, so he must've been proud of it. However, I'd say his movies were better the leaner and meaner they were, not bloated up and trying to be classy. 
[4/10]



Two Sentence Horror Stories: Crush

“Two Sentence Horror Stories” was canceled by the CW earlier this year with little fanfare. Yet I've enjoyed the two episodes of the rarely discussed anthology I previously watched, so let's give another one a shot. “Crush” follows two elderly twins, Mabel and Jane Laurent, living in a moldering home piled up with decades of possessions. Mabel was a popular singer many years ago, while Mabel pines for contact with her estranged son. The two sisters bicker constantly, Jane killing Mabel's beloved pet rats and Mabel destroying Jane's prized mementos. When a caretaker named Seth enters the home, the years of resentment between the girls start to boil over. But Seth has a secret...

“Crush” is some amusingly trashy hag-horror. The production designer, set dresser, and costume maker really went all-out on this one. The home is filled, floor to ceiling, with old junk. Boxes over flow with weathered knickknacks. The twins wear perfectly gaudy outfits, poorly fitting gowns made up of mismatched colors. The more we see of “Crush's” setting, the more outrageously grotesque it becomes. Mabel keeps all her dead rats in shoe boxes, piled atop each other. Later, those boxes come falling down, little rat bones hitting the floor. Plates of moldy cheese are passed back and forth. Rotting dolls and stuffed animals, faded photographs, and wheezing old machinery decorate every corner of the house. It is all so beautifully hideous. 

The story and tone matches the campy excess of the setting. At first, I thought one actress was playing both twins through camera tricks. Nope, the casting directors really did find elderly twin sisters who are both actresses. Jacqueline Robbins plays Mabel and Joyce Robbins plays Jane. And both are having a ball. Each sister clearly delights in being passive aggressive to the other, which both actresses truly embrace. As the material grows more overheated, so do these wonderfully over-the-top sisters. The scene where Jane humiliates Mabel by playing a recording of her career destroying performance is fantastic. As knowingly ridiculous as “Crush” is, you do end up caring about these two. Largely because the Robbins sisters ground them in just enough reality to make them seem real. Watching the two come together – in a plot twist that thankfully avoided the routine area I figured this would go at first – is truly satisfying. The final scene is an ideally monstrous note to take us out on. People rag on this show but, I don't know, I kind of love this stupid bullshit. [8/10]





Before directing mind-melting, instant cult classic “The Empty Man,” David Prior would make this similarly themed short film. “AM1200” follows Sam, a low-ranking executive who makes off with company funds after his partner-in-crime commits suicide. On the run, Sam drives his car down obscure roads. While scanning through the radio at night, he hears a snippet of a broadcast. Of someone begging from help, from the radio station AM1200. Unwittingly, he ends up at that exact station. Finding the road blocked, he steps inside and discovers a strange, jabbering man who handcuffed himself to a pole. The man goes on about receiving signals and summoning something. It's not long before Sam is feeling the influence of an otherworldly power too.

“The Empty Man” approached Lovecraftian horror in its own way. “AM1200” touches upon many of the same ideas. The central premise of the short is that receive signals much the same way radio stations can. Here, the signals aren't coming from broadcast towers but otherworldly entities. That's an idea Howard Philip probably would've approved of. Especially in the way connecting with these radio waves drives men to absolute madness. Just to make sure the Lovecraft vibes don't go unfulfilled, the short throws in an eldritch horror too. Making sure these horrors are extra cosmic, there's some time loop fuckery going on as well. 

All of that is well and good. If anyone can appreciate these aspects, it's a life-long Cthulhu nerd like me. As with “The Empty Man,” you don't get the impression that Prior throws these elements into the story simply because they appeal to him. He has a grand master plan in mind and we're only seeing one small snippet of it. Either way, “AM1200” is at its most effective when following simpler muses. Anyone who has done a lot of night driving, with just the ambient chatter of the radio to keep them company, can relate to the premise of hearing something weird, late at night. Leaping from that set-up to winding up on a dead end street, with no idea how you got there, is a creepy extension of that premise. Honestly, if “AM1200” started right with Sam on the road, I'd probably like it more. I don't think the corporate money laundering was necessary, even if cutting that means we would've lost a fun Ray Wise monologue. 

I suppose that, tackling massive ideas in a quirky way that perhaps overextends itself is exactly what one should expect from David Prior. Nevertheless, “AM1200” is a creepy and intriguing horror short. If you're a fan of space squids and going-mad-from-the-revelation, you should probably check it out. [7/10]