
So much has been written about “Night of the Living Dead” that one has to wonder what hasn’t all ready been said. One important question that isn’t asked often enough is, how did such a ramshackle, micro-budget movie forever change the horror genre as we know it? Oh, yes, they’re other important pictures that help bring the genre forcefully into the present, but “Night” cemented the deal. It didn’t cut away and showed all the violence and destruction in graphic detail. There was no going back and gore has dominated the genre ever since.
But let’s give things an objective look. This is hardly a flawless film. The low budget often shows in the sometimes shaky camera, not always smooth editing, and occasionally blurry focus. The stock music bombastic B-movie serial score certainly isn’t the most memorable aspect of the production. And Barbara is far from the most assertive horror heroine. She spends most of the movie catatonic. (Her character is the only definite improvement made in the 1991 Tom Savini helmed remake.)


Meanings aside, the stark black-and-white direction creates truly chilling images. The scenes of violence are shot in such a furious manner that they are overwhelming, especially when aided by the droning score. The cast is capable. It’s a shame that Duane Johnson’s career never took off. He carries a natural gravitas and strength. Karl Hardman and Keith Wayne also give solid performances. Simply by acting beneath the radar and following their own subversive attitudes, Romero and company created probably the most important horror film of all time. [Grade: A]

“There’s Always Vanilla” is Romero’s “lost” movie. As far as I know, it’s never been released on home video until recently. (And only then as a double feature with “Season of the Witch.”) Romero has gone on record as saying it’s his worse movie. Do I agree with that assessment? Yeah, sadly, though it’s running neck and neck with “Bruiser” for that dubious distinction.
The biggest problem is there really isn’t much of a story. Oh yeah, things happen but few of them lead anywhere. The story, which is sort of a hippier take on “Five Easy Pieces,” just kind of wanders around for ninety some minutes. The movie was apparently shot more as a series of vignettes and it had to be tied together in the editing room. That is all too evident.
Even the editing, something George is usually pretty good at, is weak. The cuts are far too sudden and often abrasive. Like the ending which doesn’t make a lot of sense. The music is also really terrible, fluctuating between tinny elevator music type stuff and really bad seventies indie rock.
There is some light praise I can throw around. The performances are pretty solid, especially from Ray Laine, who’s connecting monologues is one of the few high points, and “Night of the Living Dead’s” Judith Ridley does a decent job. Some of the more artistic montages, like a certain love scene, are pretty to watch. A chase scene in an abortion clinic is mildly exciting. The bits that deal with what goes into making a commercial are interesting and certainly something Romero and his crew would know about. Finally, I do like the opening and the public’s musing about the “ultimate machine.”
So “There’s Always Vanilla” is a weak, boring, confusing, wandering attempt at seventies art. It really should only be sought out by completist of the director. [Grade: D]
4 comments:
Interested to see how the late-end Zombie films hold up. I couldn't get through five minutes of Survival. I mean, I'll save it for later and all, but JESUS
*spoiler alert* I thought "Survival" was actually something of a return to form.
Nice analysis of Night.
I'm one of the few people I know who liked Diary... I'm expecting the same to be true for Survival, which seems to have gotten wretched reviews. Whatever the case, I hope George makes a non-zombie movie next. Be nice to see him try something Martinesque again.
I think the reason George is only making zombie movies these days is because he wants to keep working and zombie movies are all anybody will give him any money for. I'm sure we all remember the hiatus between "Bruiser' and "Land of the Dead" were lots of projects were announced only to never get made. I'd embrace a return to "Martin" territory but I don't see it happening.
Also, thanks for the compliment, Kernunrex. I feel lots of times my long-winded, film-student ramblings don't really connect with anybody.
Post a Comment